Apply for a research grant
Here we share how to apply for an Alzheimer's Society research grant and explain the process we use to award grants once the funding call is closed.
Coronavirus statement for researchers
We set out what the current crisis means for our research funding programme going forward and for our current grant holders.
Before you apply
1. Check the closing dates for our research grants.
2. We require all applicants to read our applicant guidance before applying. Applications that do not follow the guidance are likely to be rejected.
3. Every application received will be reviewed by people affected by dementia. Read our top tips for grant applicants from our lay reviewers.
Due to the continued impact of the pandemic, we anticipate opening our funding schemes to applications in late 2021 or early 2022 and will provide further information here as it becomes available
Alzheimer's Society offers researchers the opportunity to work with people affected by dementia, carers and former carers to develop their grant application prior to submitting an application for funding.
The four steps of our funding process
All applications are peer reviewed. External scientific experts are contacted and asked to write a detailed review looking specifically at the clarity of your aims and objectives, appropriateness of your methodology, justification of animal use, expertise of the team and whether the proposal is good value for money.
Reviewers are asked to score the applications based on review criteria. We aim to obtain three reviewers per application and we check for any conflicts of interest.
All applications are also reviewed and scored by our Research Network.
These lay volunteers use their personal experiences of dementia to ensure that the research we fund is of the highest priority to people affected by dementia and stands the best chance of making a positive impact on their lives.
We receive many more applications than can be discussed at the final board meetings. Therefore we have a shortlisting stage to identify which applications best meet the review criteria.
This shortlisting takes into account all the scientific and lay reviewer scores and comments and is approved by members of our Grant Advisory Boards.
Shortlisted applicants have the chance to respond to reviewers’ comments, both expert and lay.
We will ask for rebuttals to be sent to us with a week’s turnaround. These rebuttals, alongside the peer and lay reviews will be discussed at the board meeting.
Shortlisted fellowship applicants will be invited to interview at our office in London. The interview panel will be made up of members of the Grant Advisory Board and Research Network.
Applicants will be emailed with dates to hold in their diaries as early as possible. Once the interview has been confirmed applicants will be sent further details of the interview and confirmed panel membership.
Grants Advisory Panel meeting
Members of the Research Network sit on the Grants Advisory Panel and meet to discuss the shortlisted applications from a lay perspective. Representatives of this panel then attend the Grants Advisory Board meeting to summarise their views and feed into discussions with the board.
Grants Advisory Board meeting
We currently have over 30 board members, split between our care, services and public health and biomedical streams. They have been chosen for their expertise and experience in clinical and academic research. They come together twice a year to discuss all of the shortlisted grant applications. The membership of these boards is published.
Applicants who are unsuccessful will be notified by email and provided with feedback from the board meeting.
Successful applicants will be notified by email and provided with feedback from the board meeting.
Once the grant has been approved by our Board of Trustees, we will issue the grant contract for the university to sign.